Effective Communication For Criminal Justice Professionals

IntroductionThe role of police officers is not limited to prevention and prove of crime or to the apprehension of offenders . They are also critical in the judicial process , acting both as officers of the law and representing the public perspective of crime . Mcguire (2000 believes that public s encyclopedism of the role of police officers has increased their signifi mountaince judicial outcomes and later on the interest of both prosecutors and defence mechanism in examining officers testimonies in toll . Researching for the impact of officers court deposition to the outcome of the discipline , the O . J . Simpson murder trial was a good moorage to analyze . For Belrad (2008 , the murder trial of American football celebrity O . J . Simpson is one and only(a) of the best illustrations of how officers affidavit can impact the court . The long-drawn litigation is one of the most disreput competent trials in American history and many believe that one of the play points of the cheek was Officer Mark Fuhrman s proof which raised the contingency tainted secernate due to discrimination and chemical reaction to the public cart on the resolution of the murder of Nicole brownish Simpson and Ronald GoldmanBackgroundFuhrman , appearing as a recover for the prosecution , accounted for the fact-finding procedures to a lower placetaken upon the discovery of the crime and the evidentiary allurement against Simpson . His testimony followed the amount mode of police testimony and the prosecutors repeatedly emphasized the committedness of the police force to resolve the depicted object and build evidence for the court hearing . However , Fuhrman s testimony during cross interrogative would upset the earlier efforts of the prosecution . In the opening statements of the cross-examination , he a lready expresses a degree of in the flesh(p! redicate) feeling around the case , admitting that it has been an exhausting process and acknowledging the pressure the police were under to bring the case to court (Court TV , 1995 .

It should be far-famed that Fuhrman acted to relate the processes the police underwent during probe and as an expert witness interpreting the evidence gatheredBelrad (2008 ) believes that though Fuhrman s testimony complied with the requirements of the court for pre- and unquestionable trial , he was not able to fully puddle his credibility . Subsequently , commentators on the case s proceedings tell that there was also less boldn ess in the investigation and evidence he presented . The situation was shape up aggravated by his assertion of his 5th Amendment rights when questioned by the defense regarding the preliminary statements and the burster that he manipulated evidence to bring around the arrest and trust of the defendant (Court TV , 1995 . Though Furhman never admits during the proceedings the fairness of the accusations , his using the 5th Amendment in spot of responding to the questions implied otherwise (Belrad , 2008EvaluationThe O . J . Simpson trial brought to light the grandeur of police officers testimony in establishing not only the rigorousness of the indictment save also the credibility of criminal arbitrator process . In court , officers are perceived to fox custodianship of evidence and as such , there is an expectation that...If you pauperization to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to g et a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay