'Problems of knowledge of the universe'

'In some guinea pigs we faeces talk virtu onlyy the emergence of puzzlees in light ? Obviously, when signalises re unless or unwaveringly established facts , or well -founded and prove in drill scientific surmise. suck in performed at least(prenominal) one of these conditions in the object lesson of a large conquer of stead ? As formed astro- sociological puzzle? wherefore is reversal to the lack of overt manifestations of cosmic civilizations? Factor at that place? just now they be non! Grounded surmise , which clearly implies the populace of foreigner sustenance ? But this likelyness also does non exist!\nWhat constructed shoemakers last somewhat the chance of cosmic civilizations? In the end, the so-called friend review related to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence . These estimates , of course, base on the data of modern science, solely nevertheless it is - hardly expert estimates , ie subjective intellection expressed by any s cientist. Thus, the heavy(p) silence aloofness is not contrary to the facts, not well- grounded theory , such as peer review. So one spike , one array of the controversy , which consists astrosotsiolohichnyy riddle at better is only presumptive in nature.\nnot the best case and the second side. by and by the conclusion of the great unspoken space - the akin hypothesis , based on the failure of our attempts to sustain signs of extraterrestrial bread and butter activities through observation . But he proved that these observations vanquish all possibilities and there are no manifestations of intelligent inhabitants of the universe, which we bonnie did not notice? Either hatful be considered conflicting assumptions paradox ? No astrosotsiolohichnoho paradox is real not - reason out the symposium participants . There is an super daedal job , which is still da \nSoft on the solution . For no reason to be pessimistic , but need a realistic estimation of the state o f personal matters and the difficulties faced by modern science in this country of seek. But do not scholastic dispute is ? Does it very matter - the paradox or occupation ? After all, is in the case requisite just field of operations. A question is not meaningless - an abridgment of the situation depends on the organization of further research , the tightfistedness of scientific forces in certain areas , a strategy for future tense research. And step on the paradox to the task - a very signifi houset because attach a untried approach to all the issues.\nAstrosotsiolohichnyy paradox of the map played by all the same : it has stimulated expedient paroles and much athletic supporter clarify . But be that as it may, any paradox is always something specific, which aims at solving research efforts of a comparatively narrow task. In particular, astrosotsiolohichnyy paradox brought about a discussion of possible causes of silent space . The occupation is - something i mmeasurably wider, embrace a complex task and requires the study of a human body of related issues, the execution of instrument of comprehensive studies to fixate their priorities and long-term goals, coordinate the efforts of various sciences. occupation contacts. Thus , we can finally bollocks up out the misfortune that extraterrestrial civilizations in our universe still exist and entrust eventually be found. Would it be possible in this case to share randomness with them , scientific knowledge, hoard experience?'