Was Socrates guilty or not?

Plato wrote about trail of Socrates in ancient Athens. Writer head word story in a way where we dont get to befall upon accusers, we are only able to hear an explanation of a person who was called to the court. In the end of the story Socrates is found finable to be punished but does that judgment reflect original guiltiness? When we considering whether someones is guilty or innocent, first we have to mien walking(prenominal) at the system of justice, rules that it follows and charges carried out. Every court follow pass judgment rules and has its own unique point of view. One can planning a judgment of guiltiness and other opposite in the same case. Court which judged Socrates follows by the rules that were set up by Athenians and reflect the standards and norms of Athens at that time. So even though we didnt get to hear accusers, reader can conclude that their hand over applied better to well known standards, required in court in opposite to the speech of Socrates wh ich didnt o turn judges. Accused claims Ive been convinced because I was at loss, not unbosom for speeches, but for daring and shamelessness and willingness to say the sorts of things to you that you would have been close pleased to hear :me wailing and lamenting .. (38d).

This means Socrates was conscious, that hes judged by rules that might not uncover the truth behind charges, and close and agreeing to those rules is impossible for him because he would deny to a person he was all his life. So what is Socrates accused of? He challenges with charges that have been lift umteen years before the trial and sound the like that: Socrate s does disadvantage and is meddlesome, by i! nvestigating the things under the earth and the ethereal things, If you demand to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay