Mt. Everest Case

Whitney Easterling Wce235 1. This tragedy occurred for many reasons, some of them being plain illusion in judgment, weather, and the risk that goes along with climbing a unornamented mountain. I believe that the roots of the problem were the leaders of this excursion. I dont debate they well(p) executed or balanced their want to complete a difficult and perilous task with weighing what is logically safe and when they should maybe arch around. 2. Yes, if you logically look at the weather conditions of Mt. Everest and comp atomic number 18 them with the likelihood of a person choosing to climb it to make a mistake, the betting odds would suggest that, inevitably, tragedies will occur. 3. I recollect that Fischer and Hall had the typesetters case to be good leaders but may go through valued their adrenaline rush and drive to reach the expire of the mountain over the health of everyone on their expedition, how swimmingly things were going, and the deficiency of organization in it all.

For example, there was a cracking dish out of miscommunication about oxygen tanks, as well as health problems of several people (including Fischer himself) that were all worse omens of things to come. I think that only strong leaders are able to barf aside their pride and determine when its time to desolate ship so that everyone doesnt pass by with it. I think their main poor decision was mainly that they didnt fold around. Partly, I would attribute it to their pride and the otherwise part I would attribute to their lack of oxygen distorting their estimate process and capability to r eason.If you want to get a broad(a) essay, ! order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay